Dear Abhishek, White Box is based on RHEL 3.0 source, so obviously better that atleast RH 9.0 but for upgradation you may experiance problems. and again 64mb RAM is not suficient enough for a RHEL grade installation and hosting. i myself sometime experiance problems with servers having 2GB RAM with dual processor and RHEL 3.0. currently i use RHEL 3.0 on 90% of my 50+ boxes.
if you are a newbie don't go for ACL based security and for administration hire a pro. regards sibayan On Wed, 1 Dec 2004 15:38:03 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dear Friends, > I have a option of installing one of the two distros on mine machine. One is > redhat 9.0 and other is White Box Enterprise Linux . Please tell me which is > better based on security and ease of use on a server(VDS with 64 mb of > memory) for hosting . > > Also can i install bastille on white box enterprise linux. > Also mine supplier told me that white box linux is just Redhat Enterprise > linux without trademark is that correct. > > Thanks for your time and effort. > I know i am asking a lot of questions but i am a newbie to linux . Pl. help > me. > -- > Regards > Abhihsek jain > _______________________________________________ > ilugd mailinglist -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd > Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi > http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/ > _______________________________________________ ilugd mailinglist -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/
