-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 >>>>> "Sandip" == Sandip Bhattacharya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Sandip> Raj Mathur wrote: >> AFAIR RH specifies that you lose your service contract if you >> redistribute their software or use it on systems for which it >> is not licensed. So if you're willing to not have RH service >> you are welcome to redistribute RHEL. Sandip> Hmm. So does that mean that it is ok to buy a single copy Sandip> of RHEL, and use it throughout the office, and keeping Sandip> your apt/yum repositories pointing to whitebox/taolinux? I doubt it :) Perhaps the RH people on this list could (unofficially) clarify? If you don't want to specify the legal position on the list, please send me a personal mail and I can cut and paste from that without having to specify name/designation in an informal message. Regards, - -- Raju - -- Raj Mathur [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://kandalaya.org/ GPG: 78D4 FC67 367F 40E2 0DD5 0FEF C968 D0EF CC68 D17F It is the mind that moves -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/> iD8DBQFCdeakyWjQ78xo0X8RAkqEAKCKQepqK+dPUTMPtzSRUaAnqcUcSACfZ+VN yeEQ8Tpcb8wtOmmWPV5Y2NQ= =RUCy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/