Raj Shekhar wrote: >> I am not suppose to change the architecture here by puting all read to >> one server and write to other, i am looking a two node active/passive >> cluster for linux. > > By active/passive I assume you mean hot/cold i.e. only one of the > machines will be active at any time and the application will connect to > just one machine ? If that is the case, you can set up replication and > have the slave as standby. When master fails, take the master offline > and you point your application to use the slave instead of the master. > Repair the master and then point your application back to the master > instead of the slave.
yes, but using a proper clustering or server management setup wont require this sort of manual app changeover stuff, and in most cases will mean zero downtime :) just my 0.015p worth .. -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/
