--- Karanbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> VIKAS RATHEE wrote:
> > i suggest u should go for nte products the simple
> reson being that intel
> > uses more cache size than the AMD which AMD
> compensates with more clock
> > speed which does not in any case can give the
> benefit or larger cache
> > size ..
> > so i would suggest intel to you....
Intel's FSB architecture is a bottleneck but they may
have overcome this with dual core etc. AMD does seem
slower when compared with same clock speed Intel,
cache definitely plays a significant role. Intel has
come up with low power CPUs that can be considered.
AMD may be better where 64 bit processing is required.
My 2c.
Regards,
--Naresh
____________________________________________________________________________________
Fussy? Opinionated? Impossible to please? Perfect. Join Yahoo!'s user panel
and lay it on us. http://surveylink.yahoo.com/gmrs/yahoo_panel_invite.asp?a=7
_______________________________________________
ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Next Event: http://freed.in - September 28-29, 2007
Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi
http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/
