Hi,

My thoughts below:

----- On Dec 13, 2007 11:15 PM, Smruti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| Sounds interesting. But when you get down to ground reality it is still not
| possible to make hardware gpl complaint.
\--

Why not?

-----
| Hardware is tangible and it costs. We can make the architecture open source
| but the hardware itself can't be made for free.
 \--

Make the hardware design open, produce it, and sell it with a price ... (1)

You can also pay for Free Software.

-----
| You can make the software that runs a calculator free but you cannot make a
| CRT monitor that can be give for free.
\--

Same as (1).

-----
| And hardware cannot be shared and
| kept concurrently simply because you can't make copies of it for free.
\--

Design of hardware and selling are two different things? You can
design open hardware, produce it, and sell it at a price to customers,
and still provide them GPL code of the hardware.

Useful references:

http://www.opencores.org/

http://opencollector.org/

http://www.opensparc.net/

http://www.srisc.com/

SK

-- 
Shakthi Kannan
http://www.shakthimaan.com

_______________________________________________
ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Next Event: http://freed.in - February 22/23, 2008
Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi 
http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/

Reply via email to