On 15-Dec-07, at 12:36 AM, Manish wrote: > I share Kenneth and Kazim's thoughts. > > Attribution section of the license text at > http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ says "You must > attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor". > Since the licensor has not explicitly specified how he wanted to be > attributed despite request, I do not know of the `correct' way of > doing that. FWIW, it makes responding to his future emails a > non-option for me.
and now that in his latest mail he is claiming to be the copyright owner of the phrase 'agree to disagree' and wants to be attributed whenever someone uses the phrase, he has descended to the level of the guy who has patented the use of neem twigs to clean teeth. -- regards Kenneth Gonsalves Associate, NRC-FOSS [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://nrcfosshelpline.in/web/ Foss conference for the common man: http://registration.fossconf.in/web/ _______________________________________________ ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Next Event: http://freed.in - February 22/23, 2008 Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/
