dear all, [snip] > youtube with its flash and other properties may be avoided
been researching. found a highly-interesting article that explains it all. found this paragraph the *most* interesting: [excerpt] But there are other reasons besides to consider including Free Software formats in your video publishing activities. Chief among them is the fact that large corporate video sharing websites like YouTube feature often unpleasant, ambiguous terms of service for those uploading files to their servers. Among others, Boing Boing's Xeni Jardin reported on the troubling issues surrounding sharing your video through YouTube. She notes that: ''YouTube's "new" Terms & Conditions allow them to sell whatever you uploaded however they want: "…by submitting the User Submissions to YouTube, you hereby grant YouTube a worldwide, non-exclusive, royalty-free, sublicenseable and transferable license to use, reproduce, distribute, prepare derivative works of, display, and perform the User Submissions in connection with the YouTube Website and YouTube's (and its successor's) business… in any media formats and through any media channels." Among other things, this means they could strip the audio portion of any track and sell it on a CD. Or, they could sell your video to an ad firm looking to get "edgy"; suddenly your indie reggae tune could be the soundtrack to a new ad for SUVs. The sky's still the limit, when it comes to the rights you surrender to YouTube when you upload your video.'' With terms of service like these it really is worth thinking twice before uploading your video to this proprietary, mega-corporate hosting service. Sure, they have more videos and viewers than anyone else, but the price could be your freedom, and control over your content. [/excerpt] reference here: http://www.masternewmedia.org/online-video/video-sharing-and-publishing/how-to-watch-online-video-with-free-software-20070301.htm the above reference also clearly mentions some alternatives that help encode, publish, and distribute using muft and mukt values, fileformats, engines, and more. which ones do you recommend? i also feel this topic must be raised at freed.in 2008 regards niyam > if you could recommend video-sharing websites that take open > fileformats (which do you recommend?) > with open licenses, and data portability...? > > thanks in advance for your responses. > > regards > niyam > > > -- > niyam bhushan > -- niyam bhushan _______________________________________________ ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Next Event: http://freed.in - February 22/23, 2008 Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/