First thing yesterday morning: urgent IM message from Suresh
Ramasubramanian (hoster of this mailing list):
Mailman is down, can you help?
OK, so we start investigating his box. He has upgraded Python2.4 to
Python2.5, and applied a Mailman security patch package. However,
whenever we try to access the page, the server barfs. On to server
logs -- syntax error in one of the Mailman support files.
Right, I can understand an upgrade causing logical errors, but a SYNTAX
ERROR!??!? Nah, I must be missing something, so I look all over the 2
upgrades. Switch back to Python2.4 from Python2.5, no joy. Recompile
all the Mailman files from scratch, no joy. Recompile the Ubuntu
Mailman package from source and reinstall it, no joy. Bang head
against wall, no joy.
Finally, desperate, I start comparing Mailman files on Suresh' server
against Mailman installed on other servers. While they are different
versions of Mailman, I do notice one anomaly: where one file has:
mlist.subject_prefix = Utils.canonstr(
val, mlist.preferred_language) <- *** Note this line ***
elif property == 'info':
Suresh' server has:
mlist.subject_prefix = Utils.canonstr(
elif property == 'info':
Saying, `no, no, it can't be!' I insert the missing line into the file
on the broken machine, cross fingers, eyes, legs, etc and restart
Mailman.
It works!
[Shift to today]
Ubuntu issues a security notice that says, in effect, ``We screwed up
with the previous Mailman patch, so here's the latest and greatest
version of Mailman, and this one really, Really, REALLY works! Believe
us!''.
I don't believe them. In the past 6 months Ubuntu has issues 80 new
security advisories. For those 80 advisories, they have issued no less
than SEVEN regressions (a regression is a patch to fix a broken patch).
A near-10% regression rate sends only one message to me -- we can't be
bothered with doing any quality control before we release packages.
Before Ubuntu came onto the scene, I didn't even /know/ what a
regression was. Today it's a common word in my lexicon, because of
Ubuntu's pathetic testing and quality control process (or lack of
process, more likely). An operating system vendor who issues a package
with a syntax error (so that the package doesn't even start up, leave
alone do something wrong), is a pure crap snake oil vendor in my book.
So, the question: will I trust Ubuntu on an Internet-connected system?
Nah.
Will I trust Ubuntu on a server? Er, please excuse me while I finishing
laughing hysterically!
Use Debian or CentOS or any of those reasonably tested other
distributions for your boxes, and when someone asks you to use Ubuntu,
in the immortal words of Fancy Raygun, ``Just Say No!''.
Regards,
-- Raju
--
Raj Mathur [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://kandalaya.org/
Freedom in Technology & Software || February 2008 || http://freed.in/
GPG: 78D4 FC67 367F 40E2 0DD5 0FEF C968 D0EF CC68 D17F
PsyTrance & Chill: http://schizoid.in/ || It is the mind that moves
_______________________________________________
ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Next Event: http://freed.in - February 22-24, 2008
Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi
http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/
