Oh no. Not again. The other thread was correct for this mail.
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 2:37 PM, M.S.Yatnatti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dear All, > All > Linux distributions are free. Free means freedom and not about cost. > whether they call themselves free or commercial. GPL is all about > four freedoms not about cost. FSF suggest the few words to be > avoided one among them is commercial. > http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html Have you read that page carefully? This is what it says: "Free software" does not mean "non-commercial." A free program must be available for commercial use, commercial development, and commercial distribution. Commercial development of free software is no longer unusual; such free commercial software is very important. Please do not add your own thoughts/words in some "reference" documents. Please correct your stand according to the same document you are referring. > Any one freedom > restricted by any distribution that distribution violates GPL. Can you please specify the GPL version and the violation against any of the statements mentioned therein. -Sudhanwa > > ~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~~ www.sudhanwa.com _______________________________________________ ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/
