It is really strange that the income tax seeks the private key besides the
public.  This in effect nullifies authenticity vis-a-vis the whole concept
of digitally signing document/ e-return.  This issue should certainly be
raised with income tax officials.

Kamal Dave
Advocate

On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 9:51 PM, Mahesh T. Pai <paiva...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Anand Shankar said on Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 11:17:42AM +0530,:
>
>  > Have any of you done your income tax efiling with digital signature?
>
> What is the cost of a signature authentication from a
> what-are-those-guys-called?
>
>  > Strangely it asks you to register your digital signature certificate
>  > (DSC) before you proceed.
>  > That appears to be genuine that they want my CA certified Public Key
>  > and digital signature.
>  >
>  > What appears to be strange is that they are asking to upload the DSC
>  > through a .pfx file or the usb token.
>  > If u see the standards .pfx file is a pkcs12 file which contains the
>  > public key as well as the private key!!
>  > Am i wrong that innocent guys must have uploaded their private keys to
>  > the income tax department?
>
> Looks more like a case of misapplied standards - probably, non-free
> apps on non-free OSes (obviously) do not comply with the standards.
>
>  >
>  > I wish to stand corrected.
>
> --
> Mahesh T. Pai   ||
> "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance,
> it is the illusion of knowledge."
> --Stephen hawking
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ilugd mailing list
> Ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org
> http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
>
_______________________________________________
Ilugd mailing list
Ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd

Reply via email to