10.3 demands built-in USB-ports on the computer, so if you don't have a USB-card for it, I would say no, and even if, you probably have to use XPostFacto.
I have a beige 233/64 MB RAM, which I have tried unsuccesfully to install 10.2 on, but 10.1.5 runs fine, but slow, too. It runs d.. fine, actually, I have 221 days of uptime now :-), and that is fine, as I primarily use it as a webserver. But if you could get 10.3, or just 10.2.x on it somehow, I'd say you should be doing fine. Cheers, Kim On 24/12/03 18:27, "Phil Marlow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 10.3 isn't "officially" supported by Apple tho no doubt it will probably go > on there still. Whether it's functional or not remains to be seen > > 10.0 - 10.2.8 will happily go on there. > > I'd have thought it would be better to keep 9.2.2 on there if you want it to > be nippy > > Phil -- The iMac List is sponsored by <http://lowendmac.com/> and... Small Dog Electronics http://www.smalldog.com | Refurbished Drives | - Epson Stylus Color 580 Printers - new at $69 | & CDRWs on Sale! | Support Low End Mac <http://lowendmac.com/lists/support.html> iMac List info: <http://lowendmac.com/imac/list.shtml> --> AOL users, remove "mailto:"; Send list messages to: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To unsubscribe, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For digest mode, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subscription questions: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Archive: <http://www.mail-archive.com/imac-list%40mail.maclaunch.com/> --------------------------------------------------------------- >The Think Different Store http://www.ThinkDifferentStore.com ---------------------------------------------------------------
