Hi, I'm new to this list, so excuse me if this is a known issue. I didn't find anything on it on the net so far but didn't have time to search much.
I have observed what i consider a flaw in the Image.paste algorithm when
used with transparent images.
transparent-columns.png is an image with 3 vertical black columns with
alpha=0.5, 0.2 and transparent respectively.
transparent-bars.png is an image with 2 horizontal black bars with
transparent and alpha=0.5 respectively.
(images attached)
When these two images are transparently pasted one over the other, using
the following code:
from PIL import Image
source = Image.open('transparent-columns.png')
result = Image.open('transparent-bars.png')
result.paste(source, (0, 0), source)
result.save('transparent-columns-on-bars-pil.png')
The result is unexpectet to say the least.
PIL seems to modify the transparency even in regions where only one of the
images has non-transparent values.
Very wrong in my opinion.
Doing the same manipulation in GIMP 2.6 gives what i consider the expected
result.
(attached for reference)
I guess the per-pixel transparency of the result should be result_alpha = 1
- (1-alpha1)*(1-alpha2),
where alpha1,alpha2 are the alpha channel values from the original images.
Regards,
Lars Ruoff
<<attachment: transparent-bars.png>>
<<attachment: transparent-columns.png>>
<<attachment: transparent-columns-on-bars-gimp-2.6.png>>
<<attachment: transparent-columns-on-bars-gimp-2.6-with-white-background.png>>
<<attachment: transparent-columns-on-bars-pil.png>>
<<attachment: transparent-columns-on-bars-pil-with-white-background.png>>
_______________________________________________ Image-SIG maillist - Image-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/image-sig
