Thanks for noting this issue Gabriel. I have filed a new ticket in our bug trac (code.imagej.net/trac/imagej/ticket/1166<http://code.imagej.net/trac/imagej/ticket/1152>). You are CCed on the ticket and should receive updates as this issue is addressed. Please add more information to the ticket if you feel I missed something.
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 3:59 AM, Gabriel Landini <[email protected]>wrote: > On Wednesday 09 May 2012 21:23:28 Senseney, Justin [E] wrote: > > I have three (really two) bugs to report that are specific to polyline > ROIs, > > tested with the snapshot build, these bugs do not occur/are not > applicable > > to shapes with shown bounding boxes. > > > > · With polygon overlays, the ROI is filled/inverted by applying a > > line from one point in the ROI to the next, instead of considering the > > spline that has been created. This leaves pockets within the ROI that > are > > not filled, as in: > > > > · Hopefully when you fix the above bug the following won’t even > be > > an issue, but just to add a little bit of complexity: I take a simple > > polygon ROI and make it non-simple using the blue tangent lines that you > > get when clicking on a point. Filling does not take into account the > > Something related I noted some time ago. > I find the smoothed ROIs a bit puzzling. Sure for deforming an ROI they > might > be useful, but is it possible to see what is in and what is not in the ROI? > Can one "draw" a pixel-accurate ROI this way? > > Is there any option to have "thin" ROI edges instead of these thickened > overlays? > > Regards > > Gabriel > > > > > _______________________________________________ > ImageJ-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://imagej.net/mailman/listinfo/imagej-devel >
_______________________________________________ ImageJ-devel mailing list [email protected] http://imagej.net/mailman/listinfo/imagej-devel
