Hi Curtis, [Re-Cc:ing everybody stripped by scijava. I love when GoogleGroups does that. It is really helpful.]
On Sat, 7 Jul 2012, Curtis Rueden wrote: > I will reply in more detail on Monday, but we should consider using a new > release version number (e.g. 20120707) instead of using a snapshot. Fair enough! > Otherwise I will have to make a new release version anyway when we release > beta3 next week. I did not think of that. But is mpicbg really needed for ImgLib2? A quick "git grep mpicbg\\. imglib2/" reveals that there are only references in algorithms-gpl, broken, ij, scripting and tests (and a link that is probably incorrect in PolygonRegionOfInterestTest in core). > Do you want to start versioning mpicbg in sync with imglib2? (Maybe we > should see what Stephan wants there). Yep, would be good to hear from Stephan about his plans there. Ciao, Johannes _______________________________________________ ImageJ-devel mailing list [email protected] http://imagej.net/mailman/listinfo/imagej-devel
