http://fiji.sc/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=639
Bug ID: 639
Summary: ImageJ2 with QuickPalm plugin
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Fiji
Version: unspecified
Hardware: Other
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: critical
Priority: P5
Component: ImageJ2
Assignee: [email protected]
Reporter: [email protected]
Deadline: 2013-07-29
Created attachment 111
--> http://fiji.sc/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=111&action=edit
simple macros for testing ImageJ2 with QuickPALM plug-in on the cluster
The resulting images after processing them with ImageJ2 together with QuickPalm
plugin is not the same as images processed with ImageJ together with QuickPalm.
Generally, I have small macros (see attachment) which takes a multi-framed
image, splits the channels and then analyses each channel separately with the
quickPALM plugin. After analysis and reconstruction I save the resulting
images.
I have run this macros both on ImageJ-win64 version of the ImageJ2 (beta
version), and the same macros on ImageJ-linux64 (also beta version). The
resulting images after reconstruction are different while I would expect them
to be identical.
Also ImageJ-linux64 gives me a warning in the command line: "multichannel image
is required". While ImageJ-win64.exe version of ImageJ2 does not complain and
have the same results as ImageJ1 version.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
ImageJ-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://imagej.net/mailman/listinfo/imagej-devel
