Hi Dscho, > I guess you're right and it is not really worth preserving because all > of our changes basically made it back into the 'master' branch > somehow.
OK, sounds good. The imagej/bioformats and fiji/bioformats repositories have been deleted. Thanks, Curtis On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Johannes Schindelin < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi Curtis, > > On Fri, 18 Oct 2013, Curtis Rueden wrote: > > > > So by removing the topic branches, we also removed the documentation > > > from what source we used to build certain revisions of our bio-formats > > > submodule. > > > > If you think this is a problem, I am fine with reinstating the branches. > > I still have the local branch pointers and can easily push them back if > > that's what you want. > > > > Personally I just thought the benefits of simplification outweighed > > preserving such (minor) history. My thinking is that many more people > will > > be looking at the list of repos in those namespaces and potentially > > wondering why we keep a fork of the project, versus the likely extremely > > small number (potentially zero) of developers digging through the git > > history and cross-checking against the given links, etc. > > I guess you're right and it is not really worth preserving because all of > our changes basically made it back into the 'master' branch somehow. > > Ciao, > Dscho > > -- > -- > Please avoid top-posting, and please make sure to reply-to-all! > > Mailing list web interface: http://groups.google.com/group/fiji-devel > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Fiji-devel" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >
_______________________________________________ ImageJ-devel mailing list [email protected] http://imagej.net/mailman/listinfo/imagej-devel
