I've gotten used to projections of stacks with spatial scales assigned losing the spatial scales. The resulting rotations are scaled in pixels.
However, I recently used an old version (years ago) of ImageJ installed on someone else's confocal and a resulting 3D projection did have the spatial scale included and correct in XY. Is the loss of the spatial scale intentional or a bug? Cheers- Michael Cammer, Sr Research Scientist, DART Microscopy Laboratory NYU Langone Health, 540 First Avenue, office MSB 0657A (elevator to MSB 6 or Smilow 4) main lab Smilow C-17, New York, NY 10016 Office: 646-501-0567 Cell (DO NOT TEXT): 914-309-3270 [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> http://nyulmc.org/micros http://microscopynotes.com/ Scheduling the time you want is far more reliable by phone call. Why not provide your phone number? Probably nobody reads this part, but everybody should and heed it: Acknowledgement in publications and presentations of Microscopy Core performed work is vital to secure support and funding necessary to maintain this valuable research resource. For publications that include work performed in the core, please use the acknowledgement statement "We thank the NYU Langone Microscopy Core for experimental and technical support" and include required grant numbers as listed here http://microscopynotes.com/ilabnyu/acknowledgements2017.pdf Please also consider staff for co-authorship if they played a key role in the study. -- ImageJ mailing list: http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html
