Here's the header from Peter Block's first, legitimate message:
===========================================================
Received: from newman.myriad.net [204.57.67.6] by hksi.net with ESMTP
(SMTPD32-6.00) id ACCC330228; Fri, 04 Aug 2000 11:18:20 -0500
Received: from tca.net (tl6-9-106.tca.net [208.180.9.106])
by newman.myriad.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA29214
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 4 Aug 2000 11:17:17 -0500
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2000 11:17:55 -0500
From: Peter Block <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: [imail] [ADMIN] test, please ignore...
Precedence: bulk
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-UIDL: 265235456
Status: U
===========================================================
And here's the second, duplicate message from Peter Block... that
arrived about 5 minutes after the first. Notice all the extra hops...
===========================================================
Received: from solonetuk.com [212.159.33.221] by hksi.net with ESMTP
(SMTPD32-6.00) id AD9C460174; Fri, 04 Aug 2000 11:21:48 -0500
Received: from mail3.burlee.com by solonetuk.com
with DomainPOP (MDaemon.v3.1.0.R)
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 04 Aug 2000 17:26:00 +0100
Received: from darwin [216.34.89.18] by mail3.burlee.com with ESMTP
(SMTPD32-6.00) id AD56307B01CE; Fri, 04 Aug 2000 12:20:38 -0400
Received: from [206.57.37.81] (helo=hksi.net)
by darwin with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #3)
id 13KkCu-0007bf-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 04 Aug 2000 16:20:24 +0000
Received: from newman.myriad.net [204.57.67.6] by hksi.net with ESMTP
(SMTPD32-6.00) id ACCC330228; Fri, 04 Aug 2000 11:18:20 -0500
Received: from tca.net (tl6-9-106.tca.net [208.180.9.106])
by newman.myriad.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA29214
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 4 Aug 2000 11:17:17 -0500
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2000 11:17:55 -0500
From: Peter Block <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-RCPT-TO: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Status: U
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [imail] [ADMIN] test, please ignore...
Precedence: bulk
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-UIDL: 265235465
===========================================================
Looking through our subscriber list, we found the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] address, but nothing for solonetuk.com or
burlee.com. So, I'm going under the assumption that the @mycafedot
address' mailserver (burlee.com or solonetuk.com) is bouncing messages
back to our listserver, unchanges. I've removed wthompson from the list,
and will contact him or her privately.
If anyone has more light to shed on this issue, please contact me
off-list at the address below.
Thanks,
Ron
Ron Allen Hornbaker
President/CTO
Humankind Systems, Inc.
http://humankindsystems.com
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
______________________________________________________________________
The HKSI-IMail Discussion List is hosted by... Humankind Systems, Inc.
Questions, Comments or Glowing Praise...... mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Subscribe.......................... mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe...................... mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
______________________________________________________________________
The HKSI-IMail Discussion List is hosted by... Humankind Systems, Inc.
Questions, Comments or Glowing Praise...... mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Subscribe.......................... mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe...................... mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
