And... it is worth mentioning that this option [SMTP AUTH] is showing up now
in near every e-mail client used on the net. SMTP AUTH is being required by
more and more ISP's and so users are going to get told to do this sooner or
later. Maybe as TLS matures SMTP AUTH will become a de facto standard.
-V
----- Original Message -----
From: Dusty Carden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 24, 1999 11:20 PM
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Relaying Messes up "Normal" users
> I have my local blocks entered under Relay for Addresses and
> then have my remote clients enable SMTP authentication in their
> client. It works out well.
>
> Dusty
>
> ---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
> From: "Rob Cartaino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Fri, 24 Sep 1999 16:14:13 -0400
>
> >-----Original Message-----
> From: Rob Cartaino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> > So I set up IMail to "Relay for Address: xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx", where xxx
is
> >my web server. That works great for relaying mail from my web application
> >but now my "regular" users are being blocked from sending e-mail (error--
> >invalid user, not a gateway).
> >
> > How should I set this up so relaying is okay if it is from a specific
> >machine on my network?
>
>
> I forgot to mention that I outsource my dial-up so I cannot specify
all
> the possible relay addresses for my users in the "relay for address"
field.
>
> Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
> to be removed from this list.
>
> Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
> to be removed from this list.
>
Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
to be removed from this list.
