Len,
I suppose if your lawyer offers enough in a settlement, we don't even have to
go to court.
But, I did not mean to be harsh. Only trying to make sure we all get the right
information. Consider the slap on the hand sufficient.
Daniel Donnelly
In reply to 05 Nov message from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>>Sorry, but you are wrong with this one!
>Excusez moi, Monsieur Dan. It was a "qualified" wrong. vbg
>>different mailboxes. The only requirement for this to be true is that the
'Top
>>Directory' of each domains definition MUST be unique. If not, then the
mail
>>for dan, in the above example, would go to the same mailbox, regardless
of
>>which domain the message was sent to.
>Hah!! so in a court of law, (and with enough money, of course), these
>extenuating circumstances could get me off on a technicality?? vbg
>Len
>Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html to be
>removed from this list.
Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
to be removed from this list.
