Interesting that I need to recheck with each upgrade and/or new hardware.
Thanks for the warning. I can't imagine trying to make SPF work without
knowing the IP, tho. Come to think of it, I upgraded the mo'board/CPU/ram a
couple weeks ago. I think I'll send a few messages to yahoo.com and read the
headers.

...

Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Authentication-Results: mta102.mail.re2.yahoo.com from=visioncomm.net;
domainkeys=neutral (no sig)

Received:       from 74.254.46.133 (EHLO mail.visioncomm.net) (74.254.46.133) by
mta102.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 05:23:29 -0800

Received:       from dan [172.30.0.203] by mail.visioncomm.net (SMTPD32-8.15) id
AD528430074; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 08:23:30 -0500

--- ok, that one's on the right IP, and

Return-Path:     <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Authentication-Results: mta203.mail.re2.yahoo.com from=caravansheet.com;
domainkeys=neutral (no sig)

Received:       from 74.254.46.165 (EHLO mail.caravansheet.com) (74.254.46.165) 
by
mta203.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 05:30:44 -0800

Received:       from dan [172.30.0.203] by mail.caravansheet.com (SMTPD32-8.15) 
id
AF054200D0; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 08:30:45 -0500

---

Phew! That's good to see. The .165 address sends 30K recipient Newsletters
biweekly and I don't want my core business (on .133) getting in trouble over
that.

Dan Barker



-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Sanford
Whiteman
Sent: Saturday, January 13, 2007 2:04 AM
To: Dan Barker
Subject: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] Multiple IPs and the gateway


> I  believe  you  are  mistaken about 8.2 and 9, but I can only speak
> what I know and run. Sniffer trace available on request.

Yeah, it's always worked for *some* people. The problem is that as far
back  as  IMail  5.x and 6.x, the `BindToIP` feature has been offered,
but  has  not  worked  consistently  across  NICs  and OS versions. We
performed  a slew of tests in 2000-2001 that showed that while turning
off  `BindToIP`  worked  as  expected,  turning it *on* was frequently
ineffective  with  standard NICs and then-current OSs. I don't know of
the  outbound  virtual host binding code changing prior to 9.x, but it
is  possible  that  there  was  an interim release with also made this
feature  more trustworthy prior to 9.x. Perhaps I should not have been
so  sweeping  and should have said "... may be a fallacy if you do not
have direct proof for your existing system."

--Sandy


------------------------------------
Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist
Broadleaf Systems, a division of
Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc.
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

SpamAssassin plugs into Declude!
  http://www.imprimia.com/products/software/freeutils/SPAMC32/download/relea
se/

Defuse Dictionary Attacks: Turn Exchange or IMail mailboxes into IMail
Aliases!
  http://www.imprimia.com/products/software/freeutils/exchange2aliases/downl
oad/release/
  http://www.imprimia.com/products/software/freeutils/ldap2aliases/download/
release/

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

Reply via email to