OK then... Don't listen.. (network planning for dummies is a really good
book)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Fravistat.com Support" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, June 10, 2000 1:30 AM
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] User Database Location Benefits
> Win 2000
> IIS 5
> DNS
> IMail with different templates
> Webtrends Enterprise
> Proprietary Security App
>
> Celeron 400 256 Mb RAM 4 SCSI drives.
>
> Why would I want to be an idiot and spend money on 4 machines? This one
runs
> as well as the IMail install I have running alone on a Xeon 500 with 512
Mb
> RAM. I learned my lesson on hardware overkill.
>
> Backup, backup, backup. Pay attention to the logs. Enjoy having one
machine
> to administer.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Grant Griffith
> Sent: Friday, June 09, 2000 7:43 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] User Database Location Benefits
>
>
> Have to chime in here. I have one server handling SQL, IMail, and IIS
> without any problems what so ever. There are reasons why smaller
businesses
> have to operate this way. And if things are working fine, why spend the
> money on the server and co-location fees.
>
> I do realise that since we are growing, I may need to change this later
and
> if it comes to that, I will take care of it.
>
> Grant Griffith
> http://www.getafreewebsite.com
>
>
> ---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
> From: "frank bone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2000 00:58:24 -0400
>
> >oh and one other note, never put IIS on the same machine as your mail
> >server, you are going to end up getting a headache in the end. The thing
> >that blows me away is how idiots have like 10 different things on a
server
> >and wonder why they have problems. It's a mail server, NOT a web server,
> NOT
> >a dns server, NOT and damm sql server etc.. Common sense here people
common
> >sense. I say use the Imail database because that is the best one to use
> >period. I say leave the web templates as they are because when you edit
> them
> >and you have problems you get all pissy, I say use your head before you
> >install Imail to your C drive and you only have a gig free, I say read a
> >book on network planning if you don't know what your doing..
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Curtis Faulkner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: "IMail_Forum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2000 2:20 PM
> >Subject: [IMail Forum] User Database Location Benefits
> >
> >
> >> I posted the following paragraph a while back and didn't get a reply
(it
> >was
> >> a fairly heavy day on the list so my message probably went unnoticed).
I
> >> apologize for the duplicity of this message, but I thought I might see
> >what
> >> you may think...
> >>
> >> I am installing on a new NT server that will not be used for Microsoft
> >file
> >> services, only iMail and possibly IIS web services. The unit will
house
> >two
> >> domains. Which route should I take; Choose from the beginning to use
the
> >NT
> >> User Database or choose from the beginning to use the iMail User
> Database?
> >> Would there be any benefit to doing it one way that would far outweigh
> >going
> >> with the other option?
> >>
> >> If I am being ignorant, please let me know...
> >>
> >> -Curtis
> >>
> >> Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
> >> to be removed from this list.
> >>
> >Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
> >to be removed from this list.
> >
> Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
> to be removed from this list.
>
> Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
> to be removed from this list.
>
Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
to be removed from this list.
