Does anyone have any input on NT 4.0 compared with 2000 Server?
I notice that 2000 server now limits the number of people that can be
authenticated using the 2000 authentication. So if you setup a WWW server
and authenticate users using their internal security or directory/drive
access you can only have as many users as you have license for.
Of course for 2000 bucks, you can buy unlimited internet users!
What a rip off. It's no wonder so many sites run Linux. It might be harder
to use but at least you don't pay 10K for software to do it either!
Anyway, is there anything in this or any other part of the license agreement
that makes it difficult or expensive to run IMAIL on a 2000 server? Does
it run better/faster then it will or would on NT 4.0
Tim D
Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
to be removed from this list.
An Archive of this list is available at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/