Sorry. :) Thanks for the clarification!
Another Q: In this new hybrid idea, would one admin the IMail installation through SQL server, then your product would syncronize that new info to the registry for IMail to use? Does IMail internally cache any of the registry info or does it go to the registry every time it processes a message? Todd -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Sanford Whiteman Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 11:33 PM To: Todd Holt Subject: Re[4]: [IMail Forum] Poll re: Interest in SQL/Registry hybrid solution Todd and All, > Would not the shorter time be better in this test? And SQL appears > to be shorter (better). I accidentally transposed the new results (I had copied the framework of my e-mail from my last benchmark and forgot to double-check). That one little typo is going to confuse so many people...D--n. Should read: ********** The results over 5 tests, with the machines otherwise idle: Registry: avg. 23.8 seconds SQL: avg. 374.6875 seconds ********** Bad know-it-all! No biscuit! Sandy Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html to be removed from this list. An Archive of this list is available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Please visit the Knowledge Base for answers to frequently asked questions: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html to be removed from this list. An Archive of this list is available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Please visit the Knowledge Base for answers to frequently asked questions: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
