Sorry Len for the late response.. Well the short answer is yes I've noticed
improved handling of the email both in / out.  Also noticed marked
improvement via our asp pages, iis, and perl seemed to run really fast 'kind
of scary' to be honest.  I don't have any of the exact, documented
improvements gained, but I do visually see the diference.  If you want I'll
be happy to post what settings I have altered, more than just the 3 listed
here.

~Rick

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Len Conrad
> Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 10:22 AM - FamHost
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Lists problem
>
>
>
> >Here's some tips for you to review, at your own risk of course ;-)
> >
> >Force the core Windows system to be kept in memory and not paged to disk:
> >http://www.winguides.com/registry/display.php/399/
> >
> >Manage File System Caching Memory:
> >http://www.winguides.com/registry/display.php/55/
> >
> >Control the System Cache:
> http://www.winguides.com/registry/display.php/931/
>
> Rick
>
> Did you notice any change in Imail behavior with these swap/cache tweaks?
>
> Len
>
>
> To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
> List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
> Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
> ___________________________________________________________________
> Virus Scanned and Filtered by http://www.FamHost.com E-Mail System.
>
>

___________________________________________________________________
Virus Scanned and Filtered by http://www.FamHost.com E-Mail System.


To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

Reply via email to