There is no rule of thumb that applies in every case. I will say multi-processors can take advantage of higher numbers of threads. If you get to many threads going your server will begin thrashing about trying to service all the threads, so be careful. You really need to experiment a bit to see what works best.
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 4:14 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Imail 8 speed is much better What is the best way to tune the queue manager? Is there any rule of thumb on threads vs numbers of mailboxes? Lee Drake Aztek Computer Solutions, Inc. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sanford Whiteman Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 1:08 PM To: Smart Business Lists Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Imail 8 speed is much better > One thing for sure is that Imail 8's delivery speed is MUCH, MUCH, > MUCH better. Word to that. I think the "realest" advance in 8 is really the QM (as far as its applicability to all installs, regardless of their anti-spam situation). -Sandy ------------------------------------ Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist Broadleaf Systems, a division of Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc. e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ �I칻 �&ކ�i��0�*l�+\��&�˩����f��)��+-�f���� [EMAIL PROTECTED](��.��+�� j)
