> You're not doing anything wrong -- filters catch words, not > attachments. There isn't any way that I can think of to block attachments > with 100% accuracy using filters.
Would a rules.ima be a better choice for stripping attachments?
I assumed he was using rules.ima? I'm not talking about Declude filters (for that, Declude Virus will automatically handle blocking of file extensions).
The problem is that if you search for "na me=" followed by anything followed by ".c om", you're 100% guaranteed to catch HTML E-mail that contains "na me=" followed by anything followed by ".c om". :)
Using "filena me=" produces less false positives (since much fewer HTML E-mails have "filena me=" in them), but also would somewhat few attachments.
-Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers.
Declude Virus: Catches known viruses and is the leader in mailserver vulnerability detection.
Find out what you have been missing: Ask for a free 30-day evaluation.
--- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
