Ouch! I wasn't going to get into this but since I've been out drinking all night I have to put in my half cent. When we first bought into IMail I knew nothing about it.All I knew was that I had to have antivirus for it. (about $4000). I've been on the IMail list since we bought it. I read most of the post on this list. I don't have problems with IMail but I keep up with everyone else's problems incase it come up on our site. Everything I've read about declude sounded good. Our IMail renewal is coming up but I've decided that I'ts time to drop the AV on IMail for Declude. (It's less expensive and give more features.) Like I said I've been reading this list for about a year. I don't have much to contribute. Most of the people on the list know this stuff inside and out so I just listen. (I also know which posters have the bad attitudes.) I haven't figured out how it is easier for them to go into a two paragraph rampage about reading the manual and check the archive then just giving the answer they want or just not answering at all. Oops! sorry about the rant.
Gary Gary ----- Original Message ----- From: "Guy Isabel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, August 30, 2003 7:40 PM Subject: Re: [OVER DELETE WEIGHT]Re: [IMail Forum] new spam technique > With all due respect, and reasserting that my former post explicitly called > for not initiating a flame war, I both agree and disagree with what you > wrote :-) > > 1. I agree that "Edulced" should not be considered, by itself, a dirty word > on this list. If it were, Ipswitch would likely have issued a "fair-use" > warning about this very list that they (thankfully) provide. > > 2. I, however, disagree with your statement that some posters referring to > "Edulced" make purchasers of IMail 8.x seem like suckers if they do not > purchase an add-on. In four years, I have never seen a single posting to > that effect. It's just that many mail admins happened to be customers of > "Edulced" and likely have been so well before Ipswitch released IMail 8.x. > They may well be very enthusiastic with "Edulced" and may have a knee-jerk > reaction to respond with "Get Edulced". This should not in any way reflect > badly on Mr. Perry as he is most certainly not the person posting one-liner > replies such as "Get Edulced". > > Regards, > > Guy > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "RMilner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Saturday, August 30, 2003 20:16 > Subject: RE: [OVER DELETE WEIGHT]Re: [IMail Forum] new spam technique > > > > Declude is not a dirty word. It is only a dirty word when as below, only a > > declude solution is mentioned without any mention of the I-Mail's built in > > filtering of this type with the HTML deceptive comment solution. Some > people > > actually purchased I-Mail off the ads for Spam Filtering in Version 8.0 > and > > do not want to be told they were suckers and really needed to buy > eclude - > > when somewhat of a solution exists within the product they already > > purchased. > > > To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html > List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ > Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ > To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
