> The first is: [EMAIL PROTECTED] will be actually
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and this will prevent [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> from being created.
Usernames must indeed be unique within a host and its host aliases.
The feasibility depends on how much overlap you're inheriting (i.e.
the current overlap, which will require username changes) and what
users will tolerate in the future (i.e. getting 'waheed2' when they
want 'waheed').????
Can you explain me more plz? and doesthis mean thant you agree with my idea (aliases instead of real domains) and if so, do you have an idea with the maximum number of aliases I can assign for each domain, as I may reach to 30000 aliases.
> The second: When sending from [EMAIL PROTECTED] it will send
> as [EMAIL PROTECTED], this means when you receive a message from
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] you will see the sender is
> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
The Reply-To: is a per-user setting and does not need to be tied to
the virtual host.Ok, it's applicable, and the Reply-to changes the sender name.
--Sandy
------------------------------------
Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist
Broadleaf Systems, a division of
Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc.
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SpamAssassin plugs into Declude!
http://www.mailmage.com/download/software/freeutils/SPAMC32/Release/
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www..ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes
