Yes, it is possible to have Imail use AD users. There are a couple of KB articles on this and there is information in the archives as well.

 

The percentage of configurations running on a Domain Controller has to do more with intended use of Imail, than issues running it on a Domain Controller. I would say there are more Imail installs in ISP configurations and other non-domain integrated configurations than using a domain configuration.

 

John Tolmachoff

Engineer/Consultant/Owner

eServices For You

 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marty Pigg
Sent:
Tuesday, March 09, 2004 4:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [IMail Forum] Planning Ipswitch Install

 

Greetings,

 

I am doing some research for a possible IMail installation. I have been subscribing to the list for a week or so, and the information being shared is great.

 

One question I have relates to installing IMail in a Win2K / Active Directory scenario...

 

Assuming a Native Mode Win2K network, does anyone know the pros and cons of setting up users? One major objective (of several) that I would like to achieve:
I want to leverage my Active Directory with IMail. That is, I don't want to recreate user accounts, or import them. I want account integration between AD and Imail. If a user changes their password in AD, then IMail uses the same credential. If a user is deleted in AD, then the IMail account is also deleted.


Is this possible? If yes, does IMail have to be installed on a Domain Controller?

 

I noticed in the recently published IMail survey results that only around 5% of those running IMail installed it on a Domain Controller. Clearly, there must be compelling advantages to not installing on a DC, other than performance. Anyone have any thoughts on these issues?

 

Thanks in advance.

 

Marty P.

Reply via email to