As long as we are discussing it, got this email today:
-----Original Message----- From: Helga Milton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, April 11, 2004 11:27 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: SPAM DNSBL troublesome away G et A n y P e r s c r i p t i o n Now, perscription is in my phrase list. I was under the impression that 8.1 was supposed to detect stuff like this with attempts to hide the true word. This one looks easy and it got passed IMail 8.1...luckily the DNSBL caught it, but as it failed on 1 instead of 2 tests, it was subject to less severe checking. What happens with a more complex attempt to hide the true word? -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Sanford Whiteman Sent: Monday, April 12, 2004 12:13 AM To: RMilner Subject: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] Major Problems configuring Anti Spam 8.05 > However, rule #9 in my rules.ima (which has multiple failures) > H~SPAM-DNSBL!AND!SPAM PHRASE:spam DID NOT Trigger. Without questioning your general reports of rule trouble, I hope that that you didn't actually cut-and-paste that specific rule from a .IMA file, since it's incorrectly structured for what you're expecting it to do. --Sandy ------------------------------------ Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist Broadleaf Systems, a division of Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc. e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SpamAssassin plugs into Declude! http://www.mailmage.com/download/software/freeutils/SPAMC32/Release/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
