|
Well, yes it would, but if mail clients start
supporting SMTP AUTH as the standard, they'll probably build in 587 as the
default since it's in the RFC.. just like port 25 is the default for SMTP.
So, by using it, you'll be minimizing effort in the future.
Also, it's always good to use the standard when it
comes to interoperability with other networks. More and more networks will
be implementing and allowing 587 as time passes. Using a non-standard
port may bring some risk on it being blocked by default.
Darin. ----- Original Message -----
From: Glenn Bullion
Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2004 10:25 AM
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Remote SMTP user cannot
authenticate Yeah, already set it to 587. worked like a
charm.
Small question though. Why 587? SMTP auth port
or no, wouldn't any available port work, as long as it didn't interfere with
another service?
|
Title: Remote SMTP user cannot authenticate
- Re: [IMail Forum] Remote SMTP user cannot authent... Darin Cox
- Re: [IMail Forum] Remote SMTP user cannot au... Eric Shanbrom [Ipswitch]
- Re: [IMail Forum] Remote SMTP user cannot au... Bill Foresman
- Re: [IMail Forum] Remote SMTP user cannot au... Bill Foresman
- Re: [IMail Forum] Remote SMTP user cannot au... Rod Dorman
