On Wed, 31 Aug 2005, Tim Mooney wrote:
- It appears that mailutil double counts every message when doing a
 "check", at least for mbx-format mailboxes:

Did you modify the software in any way?

In particular, did you modify the sysinbox() routine to point to the mbx-format INBOX? If you did, don't do that.

- I see 2004f is out as of a few days ago, but the IMAP Information Center
 web page doesn't mention it or 2004e.

Both 2004e and 2004f are patch-only releases. 2005 will be the next major release, unless it gets to January in which case it'll be 2006... :-)

- It's cool that 2004f includes experimental support (not enabled by
 default) for SSL alternate names.  I tried building it, and it looks
 like it requires a newer version of OpenSSL than the standard ssl_unix.c
 requires.

Hmm.  It looks like it needs the imap-2005 version of mail.h.  Oh well

If you really want to play with it, I'll send you the definitions of sslclientcert_t and sslclientkey_t; otherwise, wait until imap-2005 comes out.

- It would be really helpful if mailutil supported some kind of a "what
 version am I?" argument, so it would be possible to interrogate it and
 find out what version of the imap toolkit it came from.

Starting in imap-2005, mailutil announces its version in its help text.

-- Mark --

http://staff.washington.edu/mrc
Science does not emerge from voting, party politics, or public debate.
Si vis pacem, para bellum.
_______________________________________________
Imap-uw mailing list
Imap-uw@u.washington.edu
https://mailman1.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/imap-uw

Reply via email to