On Wed, 25 Sep 2002 14:58:39 -0700 (PDT), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I discovered that the MULTIAPPEND draft had expired while waiting for IESG > > action. I've resubmitted it. > Grr. This is not supposed to happen. Documents which are "in the system", > and this one most certainly is, are not supposed to get deleted in this way. > > I'll complain and see what's up.
By "had expired", I meant that its expiry date had passed without a successor. I thought that it was my responsibility to prevent that from happening. The I-D repository still has -05. I just checked now. I will, however, act on your feedback right away, and submit an -07 shortly. To avoid sending yet another message to this list: I hear loud and clear that MULTIAPPEND should not go into the base specification, but STARTTLS should. I'll proceed with that.
