On Tue, 1 Oct 2002, Chris Newman wrote: > Does this imply that concurrent sessions see flag change notifications in > response to the next command they issue (as Outlook assumes)? Or are lazy > notifications permissible (where concurrent sessions may get delayed > notification of flag changes)?
I think that the answer is "yes". That is, I think that the former is preferable but the latter is acceptable. My server goes to some effort to only do the former. Given timing issues, I don't see how it is possible for a client to know the difference, unless the client operated both concurrent sessions. -- Mark -- http://staff.washington.edu/mrc Science does not emerge from voting, party politics, or public debate.
