On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Timo Sirainen wrote: > Oh, sorry. I just checked that "search to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" didn't match for > "To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]". It does seem to match for "To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (name)" > though.
"search to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" would match "To: name <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" as well. It didn't match "search to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" because there was no name, hence the canonical form didn't generate any <> pair. "search to [EMAIL PROTECTED]" would have matched all three. That's what most people use. > So, generating the (canonicalized) field from envelope's data and > matching search string against that is fine? Yes, I think so. -- Mark -- http://staff.washington.edu/mrc Science does not emerge from voting, party politics, or public debate.
