Perhaps a minor typo in the rfc, or it might be intentional but in that
case, it's ambiguous.
rfc3501, page 69, first paragraph:
If it is not feasible for the server to determine whether or not
the mailbox is "interesting", or if the name is a \Noselect name,
the server SHOULD NOT send either \Marked or \Unmarked.
page 86:
mbx-list-sflag = "\Noselect" / "\Marked" / "\Unmarked"
; Selectability flags; only one per LIST response
The first implies that \Marked or \Unmarked SHOULD NOT be used with
\Noselect. But the grammar says it's not allowed.
So SHOULD SHOULD perhaps be MUST. :-)
Andy
--
Andreas Aardal Hanssen
http://www.bincimap.org/
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/imap/imap-list.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
