I think Saptarshi did a load test of openmrs about a year ago. I can't find his blog post about it now though. I think he said that openmrs just stopped working at approx 500 users. At the time we had some things stored in memory per user and at that point it overwhelmed it. I think 50 should be ok. :-)
Ben On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Burke Mamlin <[email protected]>wrote: > I don't have figures for the simultaneous usage at AMPATH; however, I know > they have at least 25+ simultaneous and wouldn't be surprised if it's at or > above 50 simultaneous users at times with 395,115 patients, 3,170,908 > encounters, and 107,631,184 observations (as of today). If it would help, > we could get you the servers specs we're using (I believe it's something > like an 8-core 16- or 32-gig server). > > -Burke > > > On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 6:24 PM, Blaya, Joaquin Andres < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi,**** >> >> Has anyone run load tests on OpenMRS, such as trying to simulate 50 >> simultaneous users to see if the server specs being used are good enough? >> **** >> >> ** ** >> >> Joaquin **** >> >> ** ** >> >> ___________________________________________________________________**** >> >> Chief Technology Officer, eHealth Systems Chile**** >> >> Research Fellow, Harvard Medical School/Partners In Health**** >> >> Moderator, GHDOnline.org <http://www.GHDOnline.org> >> > ------------------------------ > Click here to > unsubscribe<[email protected]?body=SIGNOFF%20openmrs-implement-l>from > OpenMRS Implementers' mailing list > _________________________________________ To unsubscribe from OpenMRS Implementers' mailing list, send an e-mail to [email protected] with "SIGNOFF openmrs-implement-l" in the body (not the subject) of your e-mail. [mailto:[email protected]?body=SIGNOFF%20openmrs-implement-l]
