Sam Ruby wrote: > If you check, you will see that I kept the "single function that generates > multiple tests using yield"... the tests themselves don't have to be in a > class which subclasses off of UnitTest, instead they are grafted on later.
Sure. I just meant that it's non trivial to write tests in this way such that they are both valid nose tests and valid UnitTest tsts. > Since you asked, my first preference is to avoid dependencies which are not > in the standard library. My second preference is to avoid dependencies which > are not available via apt-get in Ubuntu. The latter brings in json, but > does not bring in nose. > > The fact that it is Ubuntu isn't important, it merely > is an indirect measure of how common or standard a given module is. My > experience is that the more non-standard and non-common you go, the smaller > the development community will be, and the more fragile the module itself > will be. OK, that sounds like a compelling enough argument. I've checked in the patch. Thanks again. Somewhat related; I've created a wiki page at http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/Parser_tests documenting the test format we are using. -- "Eternity's a terrible thought. I mean, where's it all going to end?" -- Tom Stoppard, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead _______________________________________________ implementors mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.whatwg.org/listinfo.cgi/implementors-whatwg.org
