2006/12/28, Anne van Kesteren: > On Wed, 27 Dec 2006 18:34:23 +0100, Thomas Broyer wrote: > > It seems you emit a comment token X for <?X> where you really should emit > ?X according to the specification.
I disagree. In "tag open state": <http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#tag-open> """ Consume the next input character: [...] U+003F QUESTION MARK (?) Parse error. Switch to the bogus comment state. """ The question mark is consumed, so it's not part of the comment's value. -- Thomas Broyer _______________________________________________ implementors mailing list [email protected] http://lists.whatwg.org/listinfo.cgi/implementors-whatwg.org
