On Jun 28, 2007, at 17:19, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Thu, 28 Jun 2007 16:11:58 +0200, Henri Sivonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> On Jun 28, 2007, at 17:08, Anne van Kesteren wrote: >>> On Thu, 28 Jun 2007 16:05:44 +0200, Henri Sivonen >>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> NO_DOCTYPE_ERRORS >>> >>> I think you do want every DOCTYPE that triggers quirks mode or >>> almost quirks mode (or whatever they're called these days) to >>> trigger an error in this mode. >> >> The definition would delegate actions on a quirky doctype to the >> app so that survey spiders could note the situation specifically. >> Do you expect people to do bad things with this mode if I leave >> even quirkiness reporting to the app? > > My thought was that it would be more useful for surveys if you > don't have to manually add such errors. However, I suppose you can > argue either way and I don't feel strongly about it.
There's also the option of adding yet another mode. Make it a pref. ;-) ALLOW_ANY_STANDARDS_MODE -- Henri Sivonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hsivonen.iki.fi/ _______________________________________________ implementors mailing list implementors@lists.whatwg.org http://lists.whatwg.org/listinfo.cgi/implementors-whatwg.org
