Is it possible to use a source key that makes it clear that its CLC?
Are the values for CLC:code and CLC:id listed on the wiki? If CLC:code indicates the landuse type, is there any value to it if it is duplicating the tagging? From: Balázs Szalkai [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, October 29, 2012 7:45 AM To: Martin Koppenhoefer; [email protected] Subject: Re: [Imports] Hungarian CLC import Hi, Here are the properties of an example multipolygon: <tag k="CLC:code" v="311"/> <tag k="CLC:id" v="HU-18010"/> <tag k="CLC:year" v="2006"/> <tag k="landuse" v="forest"/> <tag k="source" v="© EEA, Koppenhága (2009); Készítette a FÖMI a KvVM megbízásából (2009)"/> <tag k="wood" v="deciduous"/> <tag k="type" v="multipolygon"/> "You will also see that people are adjusting their own work to what is already there (because that's the "standard")" Well, I'm not sure. My humble experience shows that there are very thorough mappers who e.g. always add a "source" tag to their additions (even if it is a survey) and try to be as precise as possible, and there are people who flood OpenStreetMap with rivers, places, etc. that are about 70m off from reality; or they make frequent spelling mistakes (I have corrected lots of them). Your standards really do not depend on what other people do and how. But this is just my theory. "you will be surprised how fast this situation might change" Let's hope the best. A more recent and more detailed Bing would really be awesome. In the past few months I recorded several tracks with my GPS at a poorly photographed area, but that was quite a tedious work compared to finding and tracing them on a satellite imagery. "Well, if there are no objections from the mappers in your area" no, there aren't.
_______________________________________________ Imports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
