On 14 December 2013 06:48, Jason Remillard <remillard.ja...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > From the file, here are the actual tags+values.
Note that other than building=* and building:type:pl=* we're talking about less than 10 instances of each tag. > > building:fireproof=no > building:fireproof=yes > > - Could you make a wiki page for this tag. It is used 90,000+ times. > It seems to be just from already started import? I've seen it used in other imports even dating back quite far. > > building:levels=1 > > - OK > > building=fixme > building=greenhouse > building=ruin > building=support > building=yes > > - building=support, is not in the wiki. I don't have any idea what > this means. Should this be roof? It's mostly columns/poles supporting rooves. I was thinking about just skipping these objects since they're just 9 and I'm not sure there's any use for them. > > description:pl=Budynek w ruinie > description:pl=Cieplarnia, szklarnia > > Does "Cieplarnia, szklarnia" mean greenhouse? If yes, it is redundant > with the building=greenhouse tag. One is more generic, one more specific, but I can skip it in the 2 instances in the data. > Does "Budynek w ruinie" mean ruins? If yes, it is redundant with the > historic=ruins tag. Ok, will skip. > > building:type:pl=Obrys budynku nieognioodpornego > building:type:pl=Podpora (słup nośny) podcienia, wiaty, galerii > building:type:pl=Przyziemie budynku nieognioodpornego > building:type:pl=Przyziemie budynku ognioodpornego > > - should this be a note? > - Does "Podpora (słup nośny) podcienia, wiaty, galerii" mean support? > Is it redundant with the building=support/roof? Again more specific, but I might skip these objects altogether. > - Does "Przyziemie budynku ognioodpornego", fireproof? Is it redundant > with building:fireproff=yes? This also tells you if a given shape corresponds to the footprint or the outline, I'm not sure what tag to use here but this is what has been used in other imports. > > historic=ruins > > - OK > > source=Starostwo Powiatowe Strzelce Krajeńskie, raster > source=Starostwo Powiatowe Strzelce Krajeńskie, survey > > - For imports, I think that we have a consensus that the source tag on > objects is not needed and it is preferable to put it on the change set > (just for imports). If you don't add them, one of the local mappers is going to fix it for you and add these tags in another edit ;) I've seen this happen before, people really expect to see the source tag in the editor if it's not imagery. So I question there's a consensus, I've seen arguments both ways even on this list, and no actual imports without source= on objects in the areas I map (vs. hundreds with the tag). Cheers _______________________________________________ Imports mailing list Imports@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
