On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 1:37 AM, Paul Norman <penor...@mac.com> wrote: > See http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/2012-April/008032.html > for the full discussion around the removal > > In summary: > - The Fresno import has a number of issues > - No one is opposed to removal if there are no easier options for cleaning > up the data > - No one has proposed an easier option > > Given this, does anyone object if I go ahead with the proposed deletion of > unmodified objects from the imports, attempting to preserve areas like > schools and fix them if possible.
More information isn't necessarily bad; I think it might be better to try to refine the imported data over time if possible. _______________________________________________ Imports mailing list Imports@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
