Thank you for listening! 

I would probably only help with Durham, so two tasks would be great.  

I would think something like 500 addresses would be a reasonable task
size.  Obviously in areas without preexisting buildings, this would go
rather quickly, but matching addresses to buildings (whether by putting
on/in the whole polygon or near an entrance) would be a completable
task.

James

On Sat, 2018-07-21 at 15:39 -0400, Leif Rasmussen wrote:
> Thank you for stopping me!  I did not fully understand the last
> email, and I am sorry about just moving forward like that.  Should I
> create one new task for both Durham and Chatham Counties, or one for
> each?  Also, how many addresses should each section have?
> Thanks again,
> Leif
> 
> On Sat, Jul 21, 2018, 2:39 PM James Umbanhowar <jumba...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Sorry, I just saw this.  Please do not upload this, yet.  You have
> > not
> > responded to any of the feedback that I have given.  Instead you
> > have
> > chosen to just upload all the points into the database and then
> > correct
> > the database afterwards.
> > 
> > Please, instead, break this into smaller areas and then conflate
> > the
> > points with existing objects and then upload. From what I can tell,
> > this would be easiest done with the Tasking Manager.
> > 
> > Also, I have already signalled my willingness to help with this
> > task
> > and using the tasking manager would allow me and possibly others to
> > help.
> > 
> > Thank you,
> > 
> > James
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > On Thu, 2018-07-19 at 23:42 -0400, Leif Rasmussen wrote:
> > > Hi everyone!
> > I have finally verified the license on the Chatham
> > > County, NC address data which includes about 44,000 address
> > points. 
> > > It is public domain except for that it has a "no direct resale"
> > > policy that allows indirect resale (includes other data), which
> > is
> > > compatible with OSM.  Durham County, which uses the ODbL has also
> > > produced address data.  I will be completing both the imports
> > this
> > > weekend.  Some discussion has taken place about adding buildings
> > in
> > > Durham at the same time as the import, but to keep everything
> > more
> > > simple, I have decided on just adding nodes for now and then
> > merging
> > > with buildings later.  This would reduce complexity and help
> > > everything run more smoothly.  I will upload all of the data
> > alone. 
> > > This helps keep everything more simple, leading to fewer
> > mistakes.  I
> > > do not see very much benefit to having several account all
> > importing
> > > the data.
> > 
> > Details:
> > Size of both imports combined: 190,000 addresses
> > Date of upload: Saterday and Sunday, 21st and 22nd of July, 2018
> > Type of import:  One time with JOSM in 20 changesets.
> > Account:  LeifRasmussen_import
> > 
> > Wiki pages:
> > Durham County
> > Chatham County
> > 
> > Please let me know of any concerns of ideas!  I would love to
> > improve
> > the import as much as I can.
> > Thanks!
> > Leif Rasmussen

_______________________________________________
Imports mailing list
Imports@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports

Reply via email to