At 11:24 AM +0000 1/25/02, Ben Rubinstein wrote: >Right, but I was surprised to discover that it was a valid card reference in >any context, eg > the rect of card field 1 of forth card
Good point -- that _is_ odd. regards, Geoff _______________________________________________ improve-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/improve-revolution
