>>> Can you give us the option of coding "put x into y" as "y = x"? >>The "y = x" function is already used a an evaluation function. It's > > How about y:=x to take a play from Pascal's book?
Hi All, IMFO, this is just the kind of syntax that creates nightmares in C. I am not in favor of it, and as noted "y=x" already has a meaning in XTalk. Having said that, I would also suggest that such proposed changes in syntax should properly be addressed to the XTalk List. It is my understanding that M/C (& by extension, R/R) attempt to follow syntax conventions established for XTalk languages in general. Rob Cozens CCW, Serendipity Software Company http://www.oenolog.com/who.htm "And I, which was two fooles, do so grow three; Who are a little wise, the best fooles bee." from "The Triple Foole" by John Donne (1572-1631) _______________________________________________ improve-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/improve-revolution
