I agree with previous responses to this query but should add that if you are
in SAS already you will find that the new MI procedure does all that NORM
does, and more. I've just started to use it and find it really easy. I've
detected a couple of bugs that I have jsut reported to SAS and I am sure
will be fixed soon (see copy below). I'd be interested to know if any other
list members have been trying out MI.

On a more general matter I don't think there is any need to worry about
distributional assumptions when one only has spotty missing data, as here. A
practical problem arises, though when one has a classification (eg red,
green, blue) and imputes from two dummies. Obviously we needto something
when an imputation gives red and green. I have fudging code for this. Does
anyone have an elegant solution?

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------

To SAS technical support

Thanks for your help earlier this week about the new MI procedure. I managed
to solve the problem I mentioned to you and I append a note about it that I
would be grateful if your could pass on to the developper. Meanwhile I have
come accross another problem which I document below that I'd also like you
to pass on.

Problem 1.
If MI with normal imputation and MCMC options is aksed to impute a variable
with all values the same then it crashes with a zero divide error and we get
no output. A patch to get over this should be easy as it would be obvious
what any missing values for this should be (unless we want to be paranoid
and worry about our data set not having seen other possible values that
might have happened).

Problem 2
This is more complicated. It concerns the maximum and minimum and rounding
options. I have got some funny results from a data set where after MI some
of my variables have had perfectly acceptable non-missing values replaced
with values outside the allowed  range. It happened to the last two
variables in my list, and when I moved the variables to the ehad of the list
they were OK. I attach the program and the two sets of output tables of
results. I could also make the data available to the developper if this
would help.   
Another problem is that my documentation disc has some help on MI, but it
doesn't give much detail of how rounding and limits are handled. Am I right
in thinking that what happens is that the data are imputed, rounded, and
then checked to see if outside limits, and then a further sample taken if we
are outside range?   When I have programmed this myself I have always just
put the extreme ones into the topmost category. Is what MI is doing better?
I would expect these two methods to have opposite biases, so maybe some
combination would be good, bu tI've not really thought it through fully.

To whoever is writing MI - well done, it is really easy to use and will make
my life much easier. Thank you.

Prof Gillian Raab
Applied Statistics Group
School of Mathematics and Statistics
Napier University, Sighthill (room 419a), 
Edinburgh EH11 4BN
tel 0131 455 3532 fax 0131 455 3485

-------------- next part --------------
References

Bagust A, Roberts B, Haycox A, Barrow S (1999), Cost of health care. The 
additional cost of obesity to the health service and the potential for resource 
savings from effective interventions, The European Journal of Public Health 9: 
258-264
Ref ID: 121
Reprint: Not in File
Blakely TA, Woodward AJ (2000), Ecological effects in multi-level studies, 
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 54: 367-374
Ref ID: 5
Reprint: Not in File
Blane D, Power C, Bartley M (1996), Illness behaviour and the measurement of 
class differentials in morbidity, Journal of the Royal Statistical 
Society.Series A.Statistics in society 159: 77-92
Ref ID: 102
Reprint: In File
Chen Y, Rennie DC, Reeder BA (1995), Age-related association between body mass 
index and blood pressure: the Humboldt Study., Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 
19: 825-831
Ref ID: 106
Reprint: Not in File
Curtis SE (1990), Use of survey data and small area statistics to assess the 
link between individual morbidity and neighbourhood deprivation., J Epidemiol 
Community Health 44: 62-68
Ref ID: 108
Reprint: Not in File
Davey Smith G, Brunner E (1997), Socio-economic differentials in health: the 
role of nutrition, Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 56: 75-90
Ref ID: 57
Reprint: In File
Davies H, Joshi H, Clarke L (1997), Is it cash that the deprived are short of 
?, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society.Series A.Statistics in society 160: 
107-126
Ref ID: 71
Reprint: In File
Diez-Roux AV (1998), Bringing context back into epidemiology: Variables and 
fallacies in multilevel analysis, American Journal of Public Health 88: 216-222
Ref ID: 20
Reprint: In File
Diez-Roux AV, Nieto FJ, Caulfield L, Tyroler HA, Watson RL, Szklo M (1999), 
Neighbourhood differences in diet: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities 
(ARIC) Study, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 53: 55-63
Ref ID: 15
Reprint: Not in File
Dubios L, Girard M, Bergeron N (2000), The choice of a diet quality indicator 
to evaluate the nutritional health of populations, Public Health Nutrition 3: 
357-365
Ref ID: 123
Reprint: Not in File
Duncan C, Jones K, Moon G (1993), DO PLACES MATTER - A MULTILEVEL ANALYSIS OF 
REGIONAL VARIATIONS IN HEALTH-RELATED BEHAVIOR IN BRITAIN, Social Science & 
Medicine 37: 725-733
Ref ID: 44
Reprint: In File
Duncan C, Jones K, Moon G (1996), Health-related behaviour in context: A 
multilevel modelling approach, Social Science & Medicine 42: 817-830
Ref ID: 33
Reprint: In File
Duncan C, Jones K, Moon G (1998), Context, composition and heterogeneity: Using 
multilevel models in health research, Social Science & Medicine 46: 97-117
Ref ID: 23
Reprint: In File
Duncan C, Jones K, Moon G (1999), Smoking and deprivation: are there 
neighbourhood effects?, Social Science & Medicine 48: 497-505
Ref ID: 12
Reprint: In File
Ecob R (1996), A multilevel modelling approach to examining the effects of area 
of residence on health and functioning, Journal of the Royal Statistical 
Society Series A-Statistics in Society 159: 61-75
Ref ID: 35
Reprint: In File
Ecob R, Macintyre S (2000), Small area variations in health related behaviours; 
do these depend on the behaviour itself, its measurement, or on personal 
characteristics?, Health & Place 6: 261-274
Ref ID: 1
Reprint: In File
Gould M, Jones K, Moon G (1997), The scope of multilevel models, Environment 
and Planning A 29: 581-584
Ref ID: 29
Reprint: Not in File
Haynes R, Gale S, Lovett A, Bentham G (1996), Unemployment rate as an updatable 
health needs indicator for small areas, Journal of Public Health Medicine 18: 
27-32
Ref ID: 126
Reprint: Not in File
Haynes R, Lovett A, Reading R, Langford I, Gault S (1999), Use of homogeneous 
social areas for ecological analyses. A study of accident rates in pre-school 
children, The European Journal of Public Health 9: 218-222
Ref ID: 128
Reprint: Not in File
Hupkens C, Knibble R, Drop M (2000), Social class differences in food 
consumption. The explanatory value of permissiveness and health and cost 
considerations, The European Journal of Public Health 10: 108-113
Ref ID: 127
Reprint: Not in File
Macintyre S, Maciver S, Sooman A (1993), Area, class and health - should we be 
focusing on places of people?  Journal of social policy 22: 213-234
Ref ID: 124
Reprint: Not in File
Mackenbach JP (1992), Socio-economic health differences in the Netherlands : a 
review of recent empirical findings, Social Science & Medicine 34: 213-226
Ref ID: 89
Reprint: Not in File
Manor O, Matthews S, Power C (1997), Comparing measures of health inequality, 
Social Science & Medicine 45: 761-771
Ref ID: 28
Reprint: Not in File
Manor O, Matthews S, Power C (2000), Dichotomous or categorical response? 
Analysing self-rated health and lifetime social class, International Journal of 
Epidemiology 29: 149-157
Ref ID: 6
Reprint: Not in File
OReilly D, Stevenson M (1998), The two communities in Northern Ireland: 
deprivation and ill health, J Public Health Med 20: 161-168
Ref ID: 114
Reprint: Not in File
Purdon S, Korovessis C, Thomas R, Hedges B (2001), The effect of area of 
residence on health, preprint
Ref ID: 125
Reprint: In File
Saul C, Payne N (1999), How does the prevalence of specific morbidities compare 
with measures of socio-economic status at small area level?, J Public Health 
Med 21: 340-347
Ref ID: 115
Reprint: Not in File
Smith GD, Hart C, Watt G, Hole D, Hawthorne V (1998), Individual social class, 
area-based deprivation, cardiovascular disease risk factors, and mortality : 
the Renfrew and Paisley study [Full text available, price (Pounds)9.40], 
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 52: 399-405
Ref ID: 93
Reprint: Not in File
Twigg L, Moon G, Jones K (2000), Predicting small-area health-related 
behaviour: a comparison of smoking and drinking indicators, Social Science & 
Medicine 50: 1109-1120
Ref ID: 7
Reprint: Not in File
Wagstaff A, Paci P, VanDoorslaer E (1991), On the measurement of inequalities 
in health, Social Science & Medicine 33: 545-557
Ref ID: 97
Reprint: Not in File
Woodward M (1996), Small area statistics as markers for personal social status 
in the Scottish heart health study, Journal of Epidemiology and Community 
Health 50: 570-576
Ref ID: 101
Reprint: Not in File
3

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: forsas2.htm
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 13621 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : 
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/pipermail/impute/attachments/20010426/d702aaa5/forsas2.obj
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: forsas1.htm
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 18411 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : 
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/pipermail/impute/attachments/20010426/d702aaa5/forsas1.obj
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: imptest_for_sasinst.sas
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 3621 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : 
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/pipermail/impute/attachments/20010426/d702aaa5/imptest_for_sasinst.obj

Reply via email to