Dear imputers

 

I have almost finished developing a web site on survey analysis as part
of an ESRC (UK soc sci res council) research methods program. It is
mainly about things like weighting and stratification, but since
imputation is an important aspect I thought I should include an exemplar
on this.

 

I now rather regret this, since it has taken me months because the
example data set, kindly provided by the researchers, was a real bummer
to impute.

 

I hope I have got it at least nearly right, but I would appreciate
feedback on any aspects. The site is

http://www.napier.ac.uk/depts/fhls/peas
<http://www.napier.ac.uk/depts/fhls/peas/index.asp> 

and the two main bits relevant to imputation are 

http://www.napier.ac.uk/depts/fhls/peas/imputation.asp

and

http://www.napier.ac.uk/depts/fhls/peas/exemplar6.asp

 

I would be most grateful for any feedback.

 

Professor Gillian Raab

School of Community Health

Napier University

tel 0131 455 5357

fax 455 5359

 


This message is intended for the addressee(s) only and should not be read, 
copied or disclosed to anyone else outwith the University without the 
permission of the sender.
It is your responsibility to ensure that this message and any attachments are 
scanned for viruses or other defects. Napier University does not accept 
liability for any loss
or damage which may result from this email or any attachment, or for errors or 
omissions arising after it was sent. Email is not a secure medium. Email 
entering the 
University's system is subject to routine monitoring and filtering by the 
University. 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/pipermail/impute/attachments/20050816/c1fedaca/attachment.htm
From f.harrell <@t> vanderbilt.edu  Tue Aug 16 14:26:49 2005
From: f.harrell <@t> vanderbilt.edu (Frank E Harrell Jr)
Date: Tue Aug 16 14:27:30 2005
Subject: [Impute] Web site with imputation example
In-Reply-To: 
<3ccae204656c9d4d91c118cd01ef63d0b0e...@evs2.napier-mail.napier.ac.uk>
References: 
<3ccae204656c9d4d91c118cd01ef63d0b0e...@evs2.napier-mail.napier.ac.uk>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>

Raab, Gillian wrote:
> 
> 
> Dear imputers
> 
>  
> 
> I have almost finished developing a web site on survey analysis as part 
> of an ESRC ( UK soc sci res council) research methods program. It is 
> mainly about things like weighting and stratification, but since 
> imputation is an important aspect I thought I should include an exemplar 
> on this.
> 
>  
> 
> I now rather regret this, since it has taken me months because the 
> example data set, kindly provided by the researchers, was a real bummer 
> to impute.
> 
>  
> 
> I hope I have got it at least nearly right, but I would appreciate 
> feedback on any aspects. The site is
> 
> http://www.napier.ac.uk/depts/fhls/peas 
> <http://www.napier.ac.uk/depts/fhls/peas/index.asp>
> 
> and the two main bits relevant to imputation are
> 
> http://www.napier.ac.uk/depts/fhls/peas/imputation.asp
> 
> and
> 
> http://www.napier.ac.uk/depts/fhls/peas/exemplar6.asp
> 
>  
> 
> I would be most grateful for any feedback.
> 
>  
> 
> Professor Gillian Raab
> 
> School of Community Health
> 
> Napier University
> 
> tel 0131 455 5357
> 
> fax 455 5359

Gillian - It looks really nice.  You might consider adding a link the 
the R/S-Plus aregImpute function, e.g. 
http://biostat.mc.vanderbilt.edu/s/Hmisc/html/aregImpute.html

We have a paper under review comparing aregImpute with MICE (it compares 
quite favorably but is much faster and allows for nonlinear imputation 
models).

-- 
Frank E Harrell Jr   Professor and Chair           School of Medicine
                      Department of Biostatistics   Vanderbilt University

Reply via email to