David,
John Graham has a nice study that just came out recently: Graham, J.W., Olchowski, A.E., & Gilbreath, T.D. (2007). How many imputations are really needed? Some practical clarifications of multiple imputation theory. Prevention Science, 8, 206-213. Best, Craig Enders From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of David Judkins Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2007 10:25 AM To: IMPUTE post Subject: [Impute] Best reference for choice of m in multiple imputation Any opinions out there about the most current paper or book with the best advice on choosing the number of multiple imputations? David Judkins Senior Statistician Westat 1650 Research Boulevard Rockville, MD 20850 (301) 315-5970 [email protected] -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/pipermail/impute/attachments/20071115/c96da3d5/attachment.htm From oharel <@t> stat.uconn.edu Thu Nov 15 13:31:05 2007 From: oharel <@t> stat.uconn.edu (Ofer Harel) Date: Thu Nov 15 13:31:23 2007 Subject: [Impute] Best reference for choice of m in multiple imputation In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> Message-ID: <002101c827be$1106b1a0$0a386...@pqcbjz01> David, You might want to supplement John Graham paper with the following: Harel, O. (2007), "Inferences on missing information under multiple imputation and two-stage multiple imputation." Statistical Methodology, 4, 75-89. DOI: 10.1016/j.stamet.2006.03.002. All the best, Ofer ====================================================================== Ofer Harel, Ph.D. Department of Statistics University of Connecticut 215 Glenbrook Road Unit 4120 Storrs, CT 06269-4120 Phone: (860) 486-6989 Fax: (860) 486-4113 Email: [email protected] Web: http://www.stat.uconn.edu/~oharel ====================================================================== _____ From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Craig Enders Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2007 12:54 PM To: David Judkins; IMPUTE post Subject: RE: [Impute] Best reference for choice of m in multiple imputation David, John Graham has a nice study that just came out recently: Graham, J.W., Olchowski, A.E., & Gilbreath, T.D. (2007). How many imputations are really needed? Some practical clarifications of multiple imputation theory. Prevention Science, 8, 206-213. Best, Craig Enders From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of David Judkins Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2007 10:25 AM To: IMPUTE post Subject: [Impute] Best reference for choice of m in multiple imputation Any opinions out there about the most current paper or book with the best advice on choosing the number of multiple imputations? David Judkins Senior Statistician Westat 1650 Research Boulevard Rockville, MD 20850 (301) 315-5970 [email protected] -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/pipermail/impute/attachments/20071115/c2cd1de9/attachment.htm From blais.martin <@t> uqam.ca Fri Nov 16 08:30:03 2007 From: blais.martin <@t> uqam.ca (Blais, Martin) Date: Fri Nov 16 08:35:09 2007 Subject: [Impute] Missing values in Stata In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> References: <[email protected]> Message-ID: <[email protected]> Dear list members I am looking for a step-by-step guide on Stata use for missing values diagnosis and handling. Anyone aware of a relevant resource? Martin Blais, Ph.D. Professeur D?partement de sexologie Universit? du Qu?bec ? Montr?al C.P. 8888, succ. Centre-ville Montr?al (Qu?bec) Canada?????H3C 3P8 ? Vox : (514) 987-3000 poste 4031 Fax :?(514) 987-6787
